As the Internet has accelerated the creation of all types of content, it's become more and more difficult to sift through that content and find something of quality. We've tried it with machines and even mass consensus but the results are either wrong or lowest common denominator. The irony in all this is that we really need other humans to help us. The vast breadth of content on the Web only highlights what we've always relied upon: the valued opinion of others.
Questions Answered:
Why is there more "stuff" than ever on the Web?
Does voting up "quality" content work?
Would people pay for a less cluttered view of the Web?
Can machines get smart enough to help us find valued content or should we rely on humans?
What of the value of relationships behind content?
What would the Web look like if user-generated content was quarantined?
Did we brush off the "professional" content creators too quickly?
Would the world be a worse place without Youtube?
If we do need quality content, then why are newspapers dying?