There is quite a lot of support in the Web 2.0 sphere for the idea that "FreeConomics" - is that all goods can be free - is applicable in the Web 2.0 and related spaces. But is this view correct, or is it great for short term market share building, but not sustainable in the longer term?
This panel's aim is to examine the arguments for and against FreeConomics
Questions Answered:
basic assumptions of freeconomics - why will it work
implications of freeconomics - how do you make money?
implicit risk of freeconomic assumptions - whoever pays pipers calls tunes
limits to freeconomics - is this sustainable, or a part of early market development
what happens if everybody else is using freeconomics too?
what are the different types of freeconomic models - open source, advertising, subsidy etc
what are the relative value - can Ads or VC's fund it all?
If it is correct, what will the incumbents do?
If it is limited, what are the implications for current "New Media" company strategies
Some economists claim freeconomics means bad goods chase out good - true or false?