Turn on ye ole Javascript to add ratings in this low-budg app.

Title:

P2P 2.0: Copyright, Streaming, and Circumventing Chinese Censorship

Your vote:
Yes No
Organizer:
Adam Fisk, LittleShoot LLC
Description:
HTTP-based content distribution is inefficient and expensive. How can a new generation of P2P applications revolutionize browser-based digital media distribution? How can you use them on your site to give your users high-resolution video for free? How can digital media creators use these new tools to reach new audiences?
Questions
Answered:
  1. How can you integrate P2P distribution on your site to give your users something they've never seen before?
  2. How can you save money and improve your site with P2P?
  3. Why isn't P2P used more?
  4. How do architectural decisions we make now affect the future of our democracy?
  5. Who wins and who loses with a centralized, HTTP-based content distribution system?
  6. Why is HTTP an inefficient protocol for distributing media?
  7. Why is P2P better?
Panelists:
Ian Clarke (uprizer.com), Adam Fisk, moderator (LittleShoot LLC), Alice Marwick (tiara.org), Aaron Ray (thecollective-la.com), Wendy Seltzer (wendy.seltzer.org)
Level:
Intermediate
Category:
New Technology / Next Generation
Type:
Panel
Event:
SXSW Interactive 2009
Matt Lyons
on 22/8/08
I'll definitely go to this one if I can get down there.
Don Regan
on 22/8/08
I'm there!
on 22/8/08
imperative to address. biggup Fisk.
Bob O'Brien
on 22/8/08
Reach more people, transparently. Thanks for this panel.
on 22/8/08
This will address many of problems I am having with the internets.
I am looking forward to this session and practicing my business english conversations with friendliest gentlemens!
on 22/8/08
Go Bamboo!
Ariel Fisk-Vittori
on 22/8/08
Cant wait bro, sounds like history in the making
Rachel Johnson
on 22/8/08
I'm in, no question.
I'm going.
on 22/8/08
Great session, would love to learn about how more sites can leverage p2p.
kymberly kelly
on 22/8/08
this is the bomb.
carson fisk-vittori
on 22/8/08
hey! i wanna go!
Jeannie Bianchi
on 22/8/08
Bamboo, great ideas. You are ahead of the curve, will attend and pass the word about this session
Amani Willett
on 22/8/08
sounds amazing!
Albert Pope
on 22/8/08
nicely!
Henry Miller
on 23/8/08
BIG TIME
Gail Vittori
on 25/8/08
Internet for the people - much needed!
on 25/8/08
I'm for it. I think it shd have more than just a tech bent though. Someone shd address content and format. Joost has had trouble with VoD. The Chinese P2Pers are kicking it with streaming. What's the scoop?
Robert Soule
on 26/8/08
I'm looking forward to hearing about how to make p2p technology more accessible to users, and utilitarian to mainstream web-based applications.
misha collins
on 27/8/08
I'll be there. I will also bring bells and whistles.
on 28/8/08
@Drew The VoD stuff is of course tricky with P2P because you need to replicate content to a lot of nodes within seconds to still be considered "live." There are different approaches to approaching live distribution with p2p. Vanilla BitTorrent uses a "rarest chunk first" downloading scheme, for example, but most clients that do quasi-live stuff do sliding rarest chunk first, or basically downloading the rarest chunk within such and such small window that could still be considered live.

To me, though, live stuff just isn't a great fit for p2p for the obvious reasons a replication delay. This panel will be more focused on how new approaches can make it incredibly easy for web sites to integrate p2p -- giving web sites just another tool to create killer content without forcing users to open external apps and such. This is what we're doing at LittleShoot and what other companies like Pando have developed, basically integrating efficient p2p distribution with the existing web. LittleShoot also does all sorts of other neat stuff with streaming downloads, but nothing particular for "live" content.
Jim Shook
on 29/8/08
Littleshooters unite!
on 29/8/08
Please put this panel up. This is the future.
on 29/8/08
Please put this panel up. This is the future.
on 29/8/08
FYI, if you are reading this and WANT TO VOTE:
As a UX person I have to comment that, although SxSW is awesome, it is not intuitive how to vote for this panel.
****to vote, you must CLICK THE STARS AT THE TOP OF THIS POST.
Arun Rattan
on 29/8/08
Really really want to go and have not yet ruled it out. Lovin' the app!
on 29/8/08
Getting Better All the Time...
eve johnson
on 1/9/08
I love the panel easy get this done do it soon,
bryden sweeney-taylor
on 13/9/08
I know voting's done, but please make this panel happen.
on 23/12/08
Very helpful, thanks!!
Julian Cain
on 16/3/09
@Adam
"To me, though, live stuff just isn't a great fit for p2p for the obvious reasons a replication delay."

This is simply in the box thinking. Utilising STUN/TURN and ICE along with SIP and SDP with Media Line support for conferencing and RTSP gives you a very fast and very workable "live" p2p streaming protocol. The reasons I used RTSP are quite clear, I did this with SIP years ago and it worked very well "live", capture/render CPU/GPU cost aside. Using these tools, RTSP stream conferencing(H.323) and a novel algorithm to split large groups into small conferences your only limited by your imagination, not replication delay. :-)
on 17/5/09
Mike rocks! Vote for him and learn to bend all browsers to your own will!
on 7/8/09
i'm there!
on 8/8/09
http://www.sneakersupplier.com buy air jordan shoes online!!!
on 16/10/09
Sounds like a great talk!
on 30/10/09
Reach more people, transparently. Thanks for this panel.
on 1/11/09
I'll definitely go to this one
on 7/11/09
I don't seem to agree that HTTP-based content distribution is not efficient. But I do agree that it can be expensive.
on 28/11/09
Very nice...
on 29/11/09
Keep it up, bookmarked and referred some friends...
on 30/11/09
Cant wait bro, sounds like history in the making .. Reach more people, transparently. Thanks for this panel.
Developed for SXSW by Lindsey Simon