With all the stuff we weed through online, good filters are crucial. Who's best-suited to determine what's best – curators or the crowd? People have their religion about one or the other, however this panel will focus on the overlap, the grey areas and how curating and crowd-sourcing enrich each other.
Questions Answered:
What are the prevalent models for highlighting good content on the internet today?
What lessons can we learn from how traditional media identifies good content?
What tools/techniques are used to cull the best crowd-sourced content?
What qualifies someone to be a curator?
How has crowd-sourcing effected traditional ways of curating?
What are the biggest issues/failures when relying on the crowd to determine what's best? (Ditto for individual curators.)
Is crowd-sourcing truly the wisdom of the crowd, or is it largely influenced by opinionated/influential individuals?
Is most crowd-sourced material vetted by an expert/individual/"super user"?
How is crowd-sourcing influencing traditional media?
What are some examples of successfully curated crowd-sourced projects?
Panelists:
Jen Bekman, moderator (20x200 | Jen Bekman Projects, Inc.), Dustin Hostetler (dustinameryhostetler.com), Paddy Johnson (artfagcity.com), Nion McEvoy (Chronicle Books), Gina Trapani (ginatrapani.org)